If I switched over to Final Cut, nobody else would ever be able to open a project I worked on in the future, but this isn't the main reason. First of all, Fstoppers owns about 12 Windows computers, and we all have to use the same software. The Deal-Breakerįinal Cut Pro is better than I ever could have imagined, but I won't be switching over to it. I've heard that Apple has "optimized" Final Cut to work better with their hardware, and I always assumed it was bull, but it does certainly appear to be true. ExportingĮxporting footage in Final Cut Pro was once again noticeable faster than exporting in Premiere. I was shocked by house easy the software was installed, how easy it was to use in Final Cut, and how good the results were.Īs I said, I haven't used many plugins in Premiere, but Motion VFX in Final Cut Pro worked better than anything else I've ever tried. Motion VFX was a sponsor for the video project I was editing in Final Cut, and they asked me to use their plugins to produce the final video. I've honestly tried to stay away from them because they have given me so much trouble in the past. I'm no expert when it comes to Adobe Premiere plugins. The other "effect" I use on almost every project is panning and zooming on still footage (the Ken Burns effect). In Premiere, this process is done manually with keyframes, while in Final Cut, it's done much more quickly with a slick UI. Warp Stabilizer can be incredibly slow in Premiere, but with a single click and a few seconds, the "stabilize" feature in Final Cut was done. I didn't spend a lot of time comparing effects in both programs, but the two I did test were noticeably better in Final Cut Pro. This "magnetic timeline" in Final Cut was certainly better for space management on my small laptop screen, but I do wonder what I would have done in a much more complex project. In Premiere, I have a tendency to move "up" in my timeline, putting the footage on higher video tracks so that I don't accidentally delete anything, but in Final Cut, I naturally kept my timeline tidier, and I only ended up using three video tracks. Although both programs are capable of mimicking the other by holding the command and option buttons, the native way they work encouraged me to edit differently. Moving a clip on top of another in Premiere will delete the bottom clip, while it will move the footage out of the way in Final Cut. The timelines work differently in Premiere and Final Cut. This proved to me that my computer was plenty fast enough to play back my relatively small 4K 100 Mbps footage at 2x speed, but Adobe's software is the weak link. When I would add effects to a clip, the footage would be noticeably lower-resolution for a few seconds (while it rendered in the background), but it would always play and scrub smoothly before and after the footage became sharp. Not only did my footage never stutter, but it also scrubbed flawlessly without any additional rendering or proxy building. This is annoying, but I've become used to it.Įditing in Final Cut Pro was shockingly fast. Sometimes, this only takes a few minutes, while other times, it can take over an hour if the project is large enough. To fix this, I've gotten in the habit of making proxies before I start editing any project. The footage may play smoothly for a second in 2x speed, but then, it will freeze up, and when I hit the spacebar to stop playing, the footage will stop and the software will freeze while the audio continues for sometimes up to 10 seconds before the sound stops and the software becomes usable again. This does also happen on some Windows machines I've used, but it's never been this bad. I edit almost exclusively in 2x speed in Premiere, and I'm sad to say that it is completely unusable on my new M1 MacBook Pro. That being said, the project I was working on was abnormally simple. I feel like no matter how gigantic my computer monitors are, they are never big enough for Adobe Premiere, and I've never understood how people can edit a video on a laptop, but for the first time, I found editing in Final Cut Pro very comfortable on my 14-inch laptop screen. I wasn't jumping around from one corner of the screen to the other like I find myself doing in Premiere. I also found that navigating around Final Cut Pro felt a little easier. There are so many extra windows and tools in Premiere that I will probably never use for my simple projects, and this complexity can be a turn-off to new users. There's no doubt that Premiere is far more complicated than Final Cut. After watching a couple of YouTube tutorials, I jumped right into Final Cut Pro without too much confusion.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |